A bio-physical and net-energy comparison of CCS and renewable energy baseload systems
May 22-26, 2017
While CCS is considered a key component for climate change mitigation, actual installed capacity to date creates concerns about its ability to scale sufficiently fast. In the face of this lag, a considered complementary trajectory is for CCuS to play a role in later phases as a way to actively reduce CO2 emissions in combination with biomass. This paper discusses an alternative option: under which circumstances would simply eschewing fossil-based CCS and readily switching the energy system to abundant renewable energy (RE) resources be preferable? We discuss the relative merits of CCS vs RE investments using net-energy as the primary metric but also provide ancillary considerations on the utilization pathway, geological, and infrastructural requirements
Please click Additional Files below to see the full abstract.
Sgouris Sgouridis, Michael Carbajales-Dale, Denes Csala, Matteo Chiesa, and Ugo Bardi, "A bio-physical and net-energy comparison of CCS and renewable energy baseload systems" in "CO2 Summit III: Pathways to Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage Deployment", Jen Wilcox (Colorado School of Mines, USA) Holly Krutka (Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association, USA) Simona Liguori (Colorado School of Mines, USA) Niall Mac Dowell (Imperial College, United Kingdom) Eds, ECI Symposium Series, (2017). http://dc.engconfintl.org/co2_summit3/29
This document is currently not available here.