June 18-21, 2006 - Lillehammer, Norway
|Editors:||, International Centre for Geohazards, Oslo, Norway|
|, Managing Director, ILF - Consulting Engineers, Innsbruck, Austria|
|, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA|
|, TU Bergakademie Freiberg, Institut für Geotechnik, Freiberg, Germany|
|, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA|
The articles for these proceedings are not peer-reviewed.
"Geohazards" are events caused by geological features and processes that present severe threats to humans, property and the natural and built environment. Earthquakes, floods, landslides, volcanoes, avalanches and tsunamis are typical examples of such events. Landslides, caused by heavy rainfall, flood, earthquake, erosion, and human activities, are the most common geohazards on land. On land and offshore, geological processes, earthquakes and human activities, for instance in connection with offshore petroleum exploration and production, can trigger slides and large mass flows. In terms of number of fatalities, earthquakes and floods are often considered the most important geohazards, although much of the damage is caused by the slides and large mass flows triggered by them. Tsunami is another type of geohazard that is relatively rare, but as the recent tragic event in the Indian Ocean showed, can have devastating consequences.
There is an urgent need to improve our basic understanding of the technical, financial and social risks posed by geohazards, the relationships between those risks, and our ability to deal with them. The need is accentuated by increased sliding and flooding in many regions, increased concern for geohazards in production and transport of oil and gas and increased vulnerability of major urban areas to earthquakes because of rapid growth of urban centers with little or no regard to proper construction of residential buildings and land use planning.
Furthermore, climate research indicates that one can expect more extreme weather in the future, leading to increased flooding, landslides, erosion, scour, and rockfalls due to melting of ice and permafrost thaw.
The World Disasters Report 2005 (Canadian Red Cross) estimated that in 2004, over 250,000 were reported killed by natural disasters—mostly from the Indian Ocean tsunami in December. Disasters affected 146 million persons and inflicted estimated damage of US$ 100-145 billion. From 1995 to 2004, about 6,000 reported disasters killed over 900,000, affected over 2.5 billion persons, and caused at least US$ 738 billion in estimated damage (Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters, Belgium). This compares to 640,000 reported killed and 1.74 billion reported affected by natural disasters from 1985 to 1994. Over the decade, 51 people died per natural disaster event in countries of high human development (as defined by United Nations Development Program), compared to 573 deaths per event in countries of low human development.
The conference in Lillehammer was a round table for engineers, geo-scientists, social scientists, public authorities and insurance companies to discuss the human, environmental and economical consequences of geohazards. The papers presented at the conference and the discussion during the conference showed that better communication and dialogue among expert from different disciplines is the key to finding viable strategies for mitigation of risks caused by geohazards. The papers and discussions in the conference covered the following topics:
- Points of view from public authorities, engineers and geoscientists and insurance companies
- Economic aspects
- Social and human dimensions
- Risk assessment and management as a decision-support tool for dealing with the risks posed by geohazards
- Presentation of new concepts, research and case studies
- Impacts of climate change (sensitivity of hazards, risk to future climate changes)
- New techniques in geohazard assessment and mitigation
The conference proceedings start with papers dealing with technical risks and related issues (landslides, earthquakes, tsunamis, remote sensing, early warning, and climate change). These are followed by papers addressing financial risks and finally those dealing with social risks. The comments received from the participants suggest that the interdisciplinary format of the conference was a great success, and should be continued in future conferences.
|Chair:||Prof. Farrokh Nadim, International Centre for Geohazards/NGI, Norway|
|Co-chairs:||Dr Rudolf Pöttler, ILF Consulting Engineers, Innsbruck, Austria
Prof. Herbert Einstein, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA
Prof. Herbert Klapperich, TU Bergakademie Frieberg, Germany
Prof. Steven Kramer, University of Washington, USA
Examples of comments received from participants:
- I have enjoyed very much the conference and my short stay in Norway. The only negative side is I wish I had more time to visit. Maybe some day in the future. I would also like to thank you for your warm welcome and for the conference organization. It was a great learning experience and I appreciated the opportunity to discuss with people working in so many different aspects of geohazards.
Marc Smith, Hydro Québec, Montréal, Canada
- Thank you very much for the excellent organization at the recent ECI meeting in Lillehammer.
Eser Durukal, Bogazici University, Istanbul, Turkey
- It was a pleasure to join your conference. Thank you very much, indeed!
Carsten Felgentreff, Universität Osnabrück, Germany
- I am writing to thank you for the great organizational effort you put for Geohazards 2006, the choice of location and timing, and arranging for the visit to NGI.
Costas Synolakis, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA
- I want to thank you for this fantastic conference. It was really exciting to meet with the experts from all over the world.
Stefan Eder, ILF Consulting Engineers, Innsbruck, Austria
Warning System for Natural Threats, Herbert Einstein and R. Sousa (Article)
Remote Sensing Technologies for Monitoring Climate Change Impacts on Glacier- and Permafrost-Related Hazards, Andreas Kääb, C. Huggel, and L. Fischer (Article)
Hazards, Climate Change and Extreme Weather Events, Christian Jaedicke, Kalle Kronholm, Anders Solheim, Ketil Isaksen, Dagrun Vikhamar, Kari Sletten, Lars Harald Blikra, Asgeir Sorteberg, and Asbjørn Aaheim (Article)
Influence of Degrading Permafrost on Landsliding Processes: Little Salmon Lake, Yukon Territory, Canada, R. Lyle and D. Jean Hutchinson (Article)
Quantitative Risk Assessment as Applied to Natural Terrain Landslide Hazard Management in a Mid-levels Catchment, Hong Kong, Ian Muir, K. K. S. Ho, H. W. Sun, T. H. H. Hui, and Y. C. Koo (Article)
Landslide Hazard in El Salvador, Carlos Eduardo Rodriguez, A. T. Torres, and E. A. León (Article)
Predicting Rainfall-induced Movements of Slides in Stiff Clays, Michele Calvello and Leonardo Cascini (Article)
Instrumentation of Flexible Buried Culvert Subjected to Rockfall Loading, R. Ebeltoft, J. O. Larsen, and S. Nordal (Article)
Dealing with Uncertainty in Engineering Design for Large-Scale Gravel Soil Slopes in the Three Gorges Reservoir Zone, Wilson H. Tang, L. M. Zhang, and Y. R. Zheng (Article)
Dam Risk Analysis Using Bayesian Networks, Marc Smith (Article)
Instrumental Intensity Scales for Geohazards, Steven Kramer and Sarah B. Upsall (Article)
The Importance of Laboratory Experiments in Landslide Investigation, Barbara Schneider-Muntau, D. Renk, T. Marcher, and Wolfgang Fellin (Article)
Comparison of Risk Management Policies in OECD Countries, Reza Lahidji (Article)
Risk Analyses and Risk Management - Slope Instabilities in Alpine Environments, S. Eder, G. Poscher, and C. Prager (Article)
The Hazard Assessment in a Terraced Landscape: Preliminary Result of the Liguria (Italy) Case Study in the Interreg III Alpter Project, G. Brancucci and G. Paliaga (Article)
Urban Earthquake Risk, Mustafa Erdik (Article)
A Capacity Spectrum Method for Seismic Risk Assessment, Sergio Molina and Conrad D. Lindholm (Article)
Probabilistic Seismic Loss Estimation for Eskisehir, Turkey, M. S. Yucemen, N. Y. Ozturk, and A. Deniz (Article)
Simulation of Socio-Economic Impacts due to Seismic Damage of Tehran Water Network, Reza Rasti and Farshad Vazinram (Article)
Evaluation of Liquefaction Susceptibility for Microzonation and Urban Planning, Atilla Ansal and Gokce Tonuk (Article)
Back Analysis of the Lower San Fernando Dam Slide Using a Multi-block Model, C. A. Stamatopoulos and P. Petridis (Article)
Integrated Natural Disaster Risk Assessment: The Socio-Economic Dimension of Earthquake Risk in the Urban Area, Sibel Kalaycioglu, Helga Rittersberger-Tilic, Kezban Celik, and Fatime Günes (Article)
A First-Order Second-Moment Framework for Probabilistic Estimation of Vulnerability to Landslides, Marco Uzielli, S. Duzgun, and B. V. Vangelsten (Article)
A Hydrodynamics Perspective for the 2004 Megatsunami, Costas E. Synolakis (Article)
Studies of the Gaviota Slide Offshore Southern California, Mark Zumberge, Jeff Babcock, Hugh H. Banon, John Blum, C. D. Chadwell, Jeff Dingler, Neal Driscoll, Gerald D'Spain, Philippe Jeanjean, Graham Kent, Graham Openshaw, and John Orcutt (Article)
Dealing with Tsunami Risk - A Case Study for Thailand, Kjell Karlsrud, Farrokh Nadim, Hilmar Bungum, and Carl B. Harbitz (Article)
On Tsunami Risk Assessment for the West Coast of Thailand, Farrokh Nadim and Thomas Glade (Article)
Prediction of Complex Systems Using Grey Models, Dirk Proske and P. H. A. J. M. van Gelder (Article)
Cost Evaluation for Traffic and Transport Infrastructure Projects Taking Account of Project Risks, Rudolf Poettler and H. F. Schweiger (Article)
Mapping Expert Uncertainties or Confidence Level in Mining Risk Prevention Plans, M. Cauvin, T. Verdel, R. Salmon, and C. Didier (Article)
On the Acceptable Risk for Structures Subjected to Geohazards, D. Diamantidis, S. Duzgun, F. Nadim, and M. Wöhrle (Article)
Disasters and Decision Processes, Carsten Felgentreff (Article)
Expected Earthquake Losses to Buildings in Istanbul and Implications for the Performance of the Turkish Catastrophe Insurance Pool, E. Durukal, M. Erdik, and K. Sesetyan (Article)
Integrated Database for Rapid Mass Movements in Norway, Christian Jaedicke, Karstein Lied, Halvor Juvet, and Kalle Kronholm (Article)
Seismic Hazards for Lifelines, Farshad Vazinram and Reza Rasti (Article)
3D Visualization for Urban Earthquake Risk, S. Kemec and S. Duzgun (Article)
Earthquake-induced Landslides in Colombia, Carlos Eduardo Rodriguez (Article)
Tsunami Relief Work - Biopesticide Spray Operations - A Case Study, Kadarkarai Murugan (Article)
An Introduced Methodology for Estimating Landslide Hazard for Seismic andRainfall Induced Landslides in a Geographical Information System Environment , M. D. Ferentinou, M. Sakellariou, V. Matziaris, and S. Charalambous (Article)
Landslide Hazard Assessment at “Sakhalin-2” Main Pipeline Project, S. I. Matsiy, A. P. Sheglov, and D. V. Pleshakov (Article)
Instability in Soft Sensitive Clays, V. Thakur, G. Grimstad, and S. Nordal (Article)
Risk Assessment Due to Debris Flows in Paz de Río-Colombia, Carlos Eduardo Rodriguez, O. I. Chaparro, and G. Flechas (Article)
Integrating Physical Accessibility of Emergency Establishments into Earthquake Risk Assessment, Kivanc Ertugay and Sebnem Duzgun (Article)
Hydrodynamics and Rheology: Key Factors in Mechanisms of Large Landslides, L. Bonzanigo, P. Oppizzi, M. Tornaghi, and A. Uggeri (Article)